Campaigns in an Age of Uncertainty: How to Build Adaptive Strategies That Don’t Break Under Pressure 

  • Published September 10, 2025
  • / By Marts&Lundy

The Giving USA 2025 report confirmed what many fundraisers already feel: philanthropy is evolving, and the traditional playbook isn’t keeping pace. In our recent webinar, Future-Proofing Fundraising: 5 Strategic Moves from the Giving USA 2025 Report, we explored how organizations can translate these latest findings into actionable strategy. 

This article builds on that conversation, offering practical guidance for implementing the third strategic recommendation.  

The traditional seven- to ten-year capital campaign plan used to be a symbol of confidence, commitment, and clarity. Organizations would set ambitious goals, create detailed timelines, and execute methodically toward a public launch. But in today’s fundraising environment, these long-range campaigns often feel more like wishful thinking than strategic planning. 

Consider the challenges facing campaigns and fundraisers today: economic volatility that shifts donor priorities overnight; gift timing; policy shifts; the rise of donor-advised funds, inflation that erodes purchasing power, and donor fatigue from competing urgent causes. These forces are no longer exceptions, they are the new operating conditions. 

The campaigns that thrive in this environment share one key characteristic: they’re built to adapt, not just endure. 

The classic campaign playbook assumes a relatively predictable environment where donor behavior, economic conditions, and organizational priorities remain relatively stable over multiple years. That assumption no longer holds. 

Today’s successful campaign leaders are asking different questions: 

  • What do our donors care about right now, and how might that change? 
  • How can we build flexibility into our goals without appearing unfocused? 
  • What scenarios should we prepare for, and how quickly can we pivot? 

The shift isn’t from planning to improvisation—it’s from planning to adaptive strategy. 

1. Design Modular Campaign Architecture 

Rather than monolithic goals, structure campaigns with interconnected but flexible components that can be scaled up, down, or reprioritized based on circumstances. 

Practical approaches: 

  • Create tiered funding levels with clear “if/then” scenarios (e.g., “If we reach 60% of our goal by year two, we’ll activate on ‘X’.”) 
  • Develop priority matrices that allow you to shift focus between initiatives based on donor response 
  • Build buffer zones into timelines that account for economic or organizational disruptions 

This modular approach proved essential for organizations navigating the 2020-2022 period, where campaigns had to rapidly pivot from capital projects to emergency operational support. 

2. Harness the Power of Sprint Campaigns 

Short-term, focused campaigns can generate more urgency and engagement, especially when tied to clear and immediate needs or current events that impact the institution. 

Strategic applications: 

  • Launch targeted campaigns around specific news cycles or issues (financial aid during economic downturns, mental health resources during awareness months) 
  • Use sprint campaigns as testing grounds for messaging and donor appetite before larger initiatives 
  • Create “campaigns within a campaign” that maintain momentum during longer efforts 

Sprint campaigns also provide valuable data about donor interests and communication preferences that can inform broader strategy adjustments. 

3. Rethink Launch Timing and Public Commitments 

The pressure to announce big goals publicly can potentially work against your institution in uncertain environments. Consider alternative approaches that maintain momentum while preserving flexibility. 

Timing strategies: 

  • Extend quiet phases to build stronger donor pipelines  
  • Consider not announcing a total dollar goal for your long-term campaign.  Focus on outcomes and achievements. 
  • Use community listening sessions to validate priorities before the public launch 
  • Implement milestone-based launches rather than calendar-based announcements 

Remember: it’s better to launch strong than to launch on schedule. 

4. Consider Blended Funding Models 

Pure philanthropic campaigns are increasingly rare for major initiatives. Smart organizations are weaving together multiple funding streams to reduce risk and increase impact. 

Blended approaches: 

  • Combine charitable gifts with government grants, corporate partnerships, and earned revenue 
  • Highlight matching opportunities and co-investments to create urgency 
  • Position philanthropy as the catalyst that unlocks other funding sources 

This strategy is particularly effective for initiatives addressing societal challenges where multiple sectors have aligned interests, such as workforce development and community health. 

5. Implement Dynamic Monitoring and Adjustment Systems 

Static campaign dashboards that update quarterly won’t give you the insight you need in a dynamic environment. Build systems that provide real-time intelligence and enable rapid course corrections. 

Key monitoring elements: 

  • Monthly pipeline analysis that tracks both volume and velocity of prospects 
  • Donor engagement metrics by campaign theme or priority area 
  • External environmental indicators that might affect donor behavior 
  • Feedback loops from frontline fundraisers and donor interactions 

The goal isn’t to change direction constantly, but to spot trends early enough to make strategic adjustments. 

Emerging Organizations 

Focus: Start small and build adaptive muscles  
Recommended approach: Pilot issue-based appeals and sprint campaigns before launching comprehensive efforts. Use these experiences to understand your donor base and refine your adaptive capabilities. 

Mid-Sized Organizations 

Focus: Balance ambition with flexibility  
Recommended approach: Implement scenario-based planning with multiple goal tiers. Create modular campaign components that can be emphasized or de-emphasized based on donor response and external conditions. 

Large/Established Organizations 

Focus: Audit and optimize existing systems  
Recommended approach: Review current campaign infrastructure for flexibility gaps. Often, established organizations need to unlearn rigid processes more than learn new ones. 

Traditional metrics such as total dollars raised, participation rates, and gift pyramid progress remain important but may tell an incomplete story. Adaptive campaigns require additional success indicators: 

Agility Metrics: 

  • Response time to market changes: How quickly can you pivot messaging or priorities? 
  • Scenario activation success: When you trigger backup plans, do they work? 
  • Stakeholder alignment during changes: Do board members, prospective donors and leadership support adaptive moves? 

Health Indicators: 

  • Pipeline velocity by segment: Are prospects moving through the cultivation process faster or slower than expected? 
  • Theme-based engagement: Which campaign priorities are gaining traction versus stalling? 
  • External alignment: How well do your priorities match current donor interests and societal needs? 

As you evaluate your current campaign approach, consider these diagnostic questions: 

  1. Flexibility Assessment: If donor priorities shifted significantly in the next six months, how quickly could you adjust your campaign messaging and priorities? 
  2. Risk Evaluation: What would happen to your campaign if your public launch was delayed by a year? Would that strengthen or weaken your position? 
  3. Stakeholder Readiness: Are your board members and leadership prepared to support strategic pivots, or are they locked into original plans? 
  4. Environmental Awareness: What external factors (economic, political, social) could most significantly impact your campaign, and how are you monitoring them? 

Campaigns remain one of fundraising’s most powerful tools, but only when they reflect current realities rather than past assumptions. The organizations that will thrive are those that view uncertainty as a condition to navigate skillfully. 

Adaptive campaigns don’t represent a weakening of strategic thinking; they represent its evolution. By building flexibility into goals, embracing shorter-term tactics alongside longer-term vision, and maintaining real-time awareness of changing conditions, you create campaigns that are both ambitious and resilient. 

The question isn’t whether uncertainty will continue to characterize the fundraising environment—it will. The question is whether your campaign strategy will be ready for it. 

This analysis is based on insights from the latest Giving USA report and strategic recommendations shared by Marts&Lundy experts in our recent webinar – Sarah Clough, Chief Strategy Officer and Vice President, Insights & Analytics; Don Fellows, Senior Consultant & Principal and Practice Leader, Higher Education; Mark Kimbell, Senior Consultant & Principal and Practice Leader, Healthcare; and Jim Zimmerman, Senior Consultant & Principal and Schools Practice Leader.  

Watch the webinar: Future-Proofing Fundraising: 5 Strategic Moves from the Giving USA Report

Related articles:
Summary – Giving USA: Beyond the Numbers—5 Strategic Moves for Navigating Philanthropy’s New Reality
Strategic Move #1 – From Transactional to Transformational: Building Donor Resilience in an Uncertain World
Strategic Move #2 – Relevance is the New ROI: Aligning Fundraising with What Donors Care About

What’s next? In our next blog, we’ll dive deeper into the fourth strategic move: Double Down on Foundation and Corporate Partnership​s.